Project-specific initiatives: Integrity Pacts
Integrity Pacts ensure that the award of orders in the case of public-sector contracts is free from corruption. They were developed by the non-governmental organization “Transparency International”, and are intended to guarantee transparency in the order-awarding process and to rule out bribery in the awarding of public-sector contracts.
Following an invitation to tender from a public-sector customer, the bidding companies sign legally binding contracts, and commit themselves to behave with integrity from the start of the tender process until the end of the project. If the contract is breached, sanctions are imposed which can be as severe as the exclusion of the company from further invitations to tender. An independent monitor supervises the contract-awarding process and observance of the Integrity Pact. The Integrity Pact ensures that the bidder is selected on the basis of fair criteria, and serves all the stakeholders as a means of protecting the integrity of the project. This aspect is covered largely through the work under our Siemens Integrity Initiative projects.
Project-specific initiatives: Compliance Pacts
Project-specific Compliance Pacts are agreements established by all relevant stakeholders to ensure that a particular project adheres to the relevant legal, regulatory, organizational, and industry-specific requirements throughout its lifecycle.
In committing formally to acting in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, compliance is designated as a topic of utmost importance for the project.
The agreements will provide a general compliance framework to be referenced during project implementation, and typically include anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, and antitrust laws, details on avoiding conflict of interest, and may include agreements to train relevant employees on the topic of compliance on a regular basis.
Such Compliance Pacts are important in order to address risk mitigation, transparency, and accountability, and will reflect a commitment for clean business.
Sector-wide initiatives
Companies from the same sector get together and draw up a code of ethics or code of conduct. These can take various forms, ranging from principles-based provisions to legally binding agreements like industry-specific Compliance Pacts. In the latter case, companies that violate the anti-corruption code are penalized with sanctions.
However the principles-based codes also have a high degree of effectiveness, as the public commitment to anti-corruption and transparency exerts increased pressure on the participating companies not to breach the agreement. This type of Collective Action is particularly suitable in oligopolistic markets.
The uncompromising support of senior management within the companies concerned is critical to the success of the initiative. In order to avoid breaches of anti-trust law, it is vital to enlist the services of an external, independent monitor.
Long-term initiatives
Long-term initiatives are particularly effective in states rated as being prone to corruption, as they pave the way to the establishment of an anti-corruption culture. Collaboration between government, commercial companies and society in the fight against corruption contributes to the raising of awareness among politicians and the general public. The acknowledgment that bribery and corrupt behavior damage the entire economy of a state brings long-term benefits for all stakeholders.
Long-term initiatives set out the fundamental conditions that will enable project-specific Integrity Pacts, project-specific and/or industry-specific Compliance Pacts to come to fruition and achieve general acceptance. Their success contributes towards a world free of corruption and helps to direct the investment of many millions of dollars and other resources towards their intended destination.