Please use another Browser
It looks like you are using a browser that is not fully supported. Please note that there might be constraints on site display and usability. For the best experience we suggest that you download the newest version of a supported browser:Continue with the current browser
Siemens has launched a global Siemens Integrity Initiative with more than 100 million US-Dollars which will support organizations that fight corruption and fraud through Collective Action, eduction and training.
What is Collective Action?
In the face of the widespread and deep-rooted corruption problem that affects society in general, governments, their procuring entities and the private sector in equal measure, it seems highly unlikely that individual activities alone will be sufficient to bring about significant ethical changes and improve the transparency of business processes.
This is precisely where Collective Action methods become important: Collective Action enables corruption to be fought collectively, with various interest groups, working together and building an alliance against corruption so that the problem can be approached and resolved from multiple angles.
The advantages of Collective Action:
At Siemens, the Collective Action methods encompass project-specific, sector-wide and long-term initiatives.
Integrity Pacts ensure that the award of orders in the case of public-sector contracts is free from corruption. They were developed by the non-governmental organization “Transparency International”, and are intended to guarantee transparency in the order-awarding process and to rule out bribery in the awarding of public-sector contracts.
Following an invitation to tender from a public-sector customer, the bidding companies sign legally binding contracts, and commit themselves to behave with integrity from the start of the tender process until the end of the project. If the contract is breached, sanctions are imposed which can be as severe as the exclusion of the company from further invitations to tender. An independent monitor supervises the contract-awarding process and observance of the Integrity Pact.
The Integrity Pact ensures that the bidder is selected on the basis of fair criteria, and serves all the stakeholders as a means of protecting the integrity of the project.
Companies from the same sector get together and draw up a code of ethics or code of conduct. These can take various forms, ranging from principles-based provisions to legally binding agreements. In the latter case, companies that violate the anti-corruption code are penalized with sanctions. However the principles-based codes also have a high degree of effectiveness, as the public commitment to anti-corruption and transparency exerts increased pressure on the participating companies not to breach the agreement. This type of Collective Action is particularly suitable in oligopolistic markets. The uncompromising support of senior management within the companies concerned is critical to the success of the initiative. In order to avoid breaches of anti-trust law, it is vital to enlist the services of an external, independent monitor.
Long-term initiatives are particularly effective in states rated as being prone to corruption, as they pave the way to the establishment of an anti-corruption culture. Collaboration between government, commercial companies and society in the fight against corruption contributes to the raising of awareness among politicians and the general public. The acknowledgment that bribery and corrupt behavior damage the entire economy of a state brings long-term benefits for all stakeholders. Long-term initiatives set out the fundamental conditions that will enable project-specific Integrity Pacts and industry-specific Compliance Pacts to come to fruition and achieve general acceptance. Their success contributes towards a world free of corruption and helps to direct the investment of many millions of dollars and other resources towards their intended destination.